Here's a table comparing the tools I used at each company:
|IDE||Visual Studio||Eclipse 3.3||I give Visual Studio the edge on debugging UI and IntelliSense. But Eclipse has some nice features, such as showing errors in the scroll bar.|
|Languages||C++, C#||C/C++, Java||Microsoft C++ is better than Gnu C++, and C# is better than Java. But it's a 10% difference, not a 100% difference.|
|Build System||NMAKE||GNU make||GNU make's better -- at least it seems to take less code to implement fancy build rules.|
|Source Code Control System||Internal tool (similar to perforce)||perforce||It's a wash - they're both very similar to each other.|
|Bug tracking||Internal tool "Project Studio"||Internal tool "Buganizer"||Google's system has more integration into email. For example, if a bug is opened against you, you get an email, and if you reply to the email your reply is automatically appended to the bug report.|
Also, Google's system is web-based, which makes it more convenient to use.
|Email||Outlook 2007||gmail||Overall I like gmail, but Outlook does have one feature I really miss: I set up a special folder for all the "checkin mails", that was sorted by name. This made it very easy to scan through people's checkins. gmail only allows mail to be sorted by time, which is less convenient for scanning checkin mails.|
I'm pretty sure that Google gives employees more email storage space than Microsoft does, but I don't remember the exact numbers at Microsoft. I do know that after 6 months at Google I'm at 1% of my quota, whereas at Microsoft, after 10 years, I was always bumping up against my quota limit.
|Web Browser||Internet Explorer||Firefox||Firefox has some great plug-ins, such as Ad Blocker Plus. but IE had the edge on printing and stability.|
|Office Suite||Office 2007||Google Docs||Office 2007 has a superior UI and far more features. Google Docs is "good enough" for programming docs, and I like the web integration very much.|
|OS||Vista Ultimate||Mac OS / Ubuntu Linux||I like Ubuntu a lot more than I thought I would. I like Mac OS a lot less than I thought I would. And Vista is fine, too.|
|Hardware||Dual-Proc Xeon x 2, no laptop||Quad-Proc Xeon, Dual Proc Xeon, Macbook Pro laptop||Google is more generous with hardware, especially in giving most employees their own laptops. And of course Microsoft only gives Mac hardware to people who write Mac apps.|
|Screens||Dual 1280x1024 21" CRTs||Single 30 inch 2560 x 1600 LCD or two 24-inch 1920 x 1200 LCDs||I love the large LCD screen. Actually I disliked the Microsoft CRTs so much that I went out and bought a 20 inch 1600x1200 LCD with my own money. For $800 (that was a few years ago, when they first came out.)|
|Office Space||Large private office with a window||Small desk in shared 8-person interior office. No window.||Having a private office is nice, but there are advantages to sharing an office with people who work on the same project. Google issues noise-canceling headphones to help reduce distractions. I'd have to say that Microsoft has the edge here, but Google is not nearly as bad as I thought it would be.|
Overall I'd say the two tool chains are roughly equivalent. I found it pretty easy to transition. I was productive at Google after just a few days of training. By far the biggest qualitative difference is due to the giant HP 2560 x 1600 LCD monitor I'm using now. It's wonderful to have so much contiguous desk space. To be fair to Microsoft, I believe that new employees at Microsoft are now being issued 20" 1600 x 1200 LCDs, and many programmers manage to scrounge a second LCD. But Google's much more generous at outfitting programmers with hardware than Microsoft.